Back to home

Aeris

A rechargeable purifier for apartments under sixty square metres, built around a filter people actually replace and an acoustic profile quieter than the fridge it stands next to.

Aeris — hero view
Final product photography. Swap these for your renders.
Year
2024
Category
Consumer appliance
Role
Lead Industrial Designer
Client
Confidential — consumer hardware startup
Timeline
11 months, concept to tooling release
Team
2 ID, 4 ME, 2 EE, 1 acoustics consultant
Status
In production

The brief

The client came to us with a working airflow platform and a problem they had already half-diagnosed: their first-generation product had excellent lab numbers and terrible retention. Filters went unchanged. Units ended up in cupboards. The brief as written asked for “a more premium enclosure.”

That was not the problem. Two weeks of home visits made it obvious that the failure was behavioural, not aesthetic. The filter change required a screwdriver, a manual, and the confidence to pull hard on a part that felt like it might break. Roughly two thirds of the owners we visited had never opened the machine at all — and a purifier with a saturated filter is a fan with a bad conscience.

So we rewrote the brief around a single measurable target: a first-time user should be able to change the filter, unprompted, in under thirty seconds, without instructions. Everything else — the form language, the CMF, the cordless architecture — was developed in service of that number. Replace this section with your own project's framing story; the structure of brief, complication and reframed target travels well across categories.

Aeris — context photograph
Context photography from the research phase.
Aeris — detail study
Early detail study.

What the research changed

Three findings did most of the work. Each one closed off a direction we had been treating as obvious, which is the only reliable sign that research is earning its budget. Methods: contextual inquiry across eighteen sites, competitive teardown of six units, and two rounds of formative testing with printed rigs.

Nobody reads the manual

Twelve of eighteen households could not locate the filter compartment without help. Four believed the unit had no user-serviceable parts at all.

The machine gets moved constantly

Owners relocated the unit between rooms an average of 2.3 times per week, but every competitor on the market was tethered to a wall socket.

Silence is the real feature

Every participant who had stopped using their purifier cited noise first. Not aesthetics, not cost, not filter price — noise.

Aeris — full width view
Appearance model, second round.

Four decisions that shaped it

Airflow architecture

We tested six intake geometries on a flow bench before committing to a 360° radial intake with a top-mounted exhaust. The radial approach cost us 8 mm of diameter but eliminated the directional placement problem entirely — the unit works the same regardless of which way it faces, which matters enormously for a product that gets carried between rooms.

The filter as a designed object

The filter cartridge was redrawn as a visible, handled component with its own colour and texture. It reads as a consumable in the way a coffee capsule does. A single quarter-turn releases it; the bayonet detent is tuned to 4 N·m so it feels deliberate rather than loose.

Acoustic development

Blade count, volute geometry and the intake grille pitch were developed together with our acoustics consultant across nineteen printed test articles. We moved the dominant tone from 340 Hz — squarely in the range the ear finds most irritating — up into a broadband hiss that reads as ventilation rather than machinery.

Cordless architecture

A 4-cell pack sits in the base, doubling as ballast for tip stability. Charging happens through a contact ring in the base so the unit can simply be set down on its plate — no plug to align, no port to fill with dust.

Aeris — concept sketch
Concept directions taken to review.
Aeris — concept sketch
Selected direction after refinement.
Aeris — model photograph
Appearance model at full scale.
Aeris — engineering view
Section through the main assembly.

Specification

The long tail of the programme was tolerance stack-ups, part consolidation and assembly sequencing, run jointly with engineering. Headline figures from the released specification below.

Dimensions218 × 218 × 402 mm
Mass3.1 kg including battery pack
Clean air delivery rate240 m³/h at maximum
Acoustic output21 dB(A) night mode / 47 dB(A) boost
Runtime11 hours at medium, 3.5 hours at boost
Filter life9–12 months typical use
HousingPC/ABS, 30% post-consumer recycled content
Serviceable partsFilter, battery pack, base ring, feet
Tooling6 primary tools, 2 family tools
Aeris — finish trials
Finish trials on production substrate.
Aeris — first shot parts
First-shot parts review.

Outcome

Numbers are the fastest way to make a case study credible, so include them even when they are modest. If a programme was cancelled, say so and say what you learned.

94%of first-time users completed a filter change unprompted in usability testing
22smedian time to complete that change, against a 30-second target
21 dBnight-mode acoustic output, measured at one metre
4design patents filed on the cartridge interface
Aeris — final product photograph
Final product photography.

Credits

Industrial designFinley Ulm (lead), Colleague Name
Mechanical engineeringPartner Engineering Studio
AcousticsConsultant Name
PhotographyPhotographer Name

Work shown with permission. Some details altered or omitted under NDA.

Back to home